A newly formed “Surrey Ratepayers Association” has been in talks with city planners to have the house size limits of the single family residential zoning removed. They also want this to be applied retroactively to all properties that illegally built larger than the current by-law, negating any stop-work order or legal action taken by the city on those properties. The city planners, in return, are recommending increasing house sizes by 1000 square feet.
The Surrey Association of Sustainable Communities (SASC) has since met with the city planners to raise concerns regarding this request and how it’s been handled by the city.
Their concerns include:
1. A lack of public consultation prior to proceeding to Council with recommendations;
2. Inaccurate, misleading and incomplete information within the Corporate Report;
3. A lack of analysis as to the impacts of the proposed modification on the City;
4. A disregard for the environment and the principles within the Sustainability Charter;
5. The creation of a culture where compliance is ignored and rule-breaking is encouraged;
6. Inequitable treatment of citizenry, specifically this case vs. downzoning of St. Helen’s;
7. Implications for an over-burdened infrastructure system, and inequitable taxation.
Please read the linked corporate report that was presented to Council by city planners and the minutes from the meeting between SASC and the city planners for more detailed information.
This topic will also be discussed at the next SASC meeting, Thursday July 16th at 7pm at Port Kells Community Hall.
#1 by Garth on July 28th, 2009
After reading the minutes from the June 29th meeting, I believe it would be extremely beneifcal if each association had a registration of owners in there area that are in support of their association to present to the City to show what percentage of Surrey residents are in favour of the Bylaws of Surrey and the Laws of BC be adhered to.
#2 by Jennifer on August 4th, 2009
This is absolutely insane. What in hell are the city planners thinking? Who and what is this Surrey Ratepayers Association? Kudos to SASC for jumping on this, and for their analysis and response to city staff. Please keep us updated.
#3 by Jennifer on August 6th, 2009
Thanks in particular to SWRA President Grant RIce for his diligent efforts in responding to the proposed RF zoning changes, per George Davies’ comments in the “Welcome” item on this site. Good fortune indeed …
#4 by Valerie on November 5th, 2009
I completely agree with Jennifer (Aug. 4/09), and I strongly agree with points 4 &5 of the concerns that the SWRA have raised.